TriBar TechnologiesTriBar Energy · Research Division
Chapter IV · Frontiers · research noteDark Energy
Research note · 23 October 2026

Testing dark energy, predictions first.

Dark energy drives the accelerating expansion of the universe, and recent DESI results suggest it may change over time. Our independent research asks whether that change is tied to the growth of cosmic structure, and whether dark energy is spread evenly or gathers in particular places.

James Epperson, Independent Researcher, TriBar Energy, Oregon

How we work

Predictions first

Before every test we write down what we expect and save it with a date and time. Then we run the test against public data (DESI, Planck, Pantheon+ supernovae and SDSS BOSS voids) and report the outcome, hits and misses alike.

Result · ruled out

Dark energy is not pooled around us

If dark energy were denser in our own cosmic neighbourhood, local expansion would run faster and could explain the "Hubble tension", the disagreement between two measurements of the universe's expansion rate. We tested this against 1,657 supernovae, 77 of them calibrated by Cepheid stars, plus DESI and Planck data.

  • Our analysis reproduces the tension: 73.5 against 68.6 km/s/Mpc.
  • Within about 50 to 300 Mpc/h of us, dark energy is uniform to about 2%. A local pool could raise local expansion by at most about 1%, not the 8% needed.
  • So the Hubble tension does not come from dark energy pooled near us. A paper on this result is in preparation.
Result · not detected yet

Do distant voids ring at a natural size?

The early universe left a natural sound scale of about 100 Mpc/h. We predicted that dark energy might gather most in voids of that size, like a note resonating in a room of the right size. Stacking the Planck CMB map on 1,074 BOSS voids found only a faint signal, under 2 sigma. The size and edge patterns lean the predicted way; the wall patterns do not. Larger DESI void catalogues will settle it.

Forecasts on record

Dated 23 October 2026

Fixed before the final DESI results and the Euclid mission's data. If they fail, we will say so here.

-0.9-1.1-1.3-1.5-1.700.511.522.5w = −1 (cosmological constant)redshift z (0 = today; larger = further back in time)wModel A: crosses −1 at z ≈ 0.77Model B: crosses −1 at z ≈ 0.71
ForecastValue
Equation of state todayw = −0.94 (−0.97 to −0.92)
Redshift where w crosses −1z = 0.77 and z = 0.71 (two models); broader family z = 0.43–1.38
w at redshift 2about −1.35 to −1.49
CMB signal behind supervoidspeaks for voids of 80–130 Mpc/h, smaller peak near 50 Mpc/h

What would prove us wrong: today's w measured below −1; no crossing of −1 between redshift 0.6 and 0.8; w at redshift 2 above about −1.2; or a supervoid signal that simply grows with void size.

Forecasts on permanent record: doi:10.5281/zenodo.23623208 (Zenodo, 23 Oct 2026)

Data: DESI DR2, Planck 2018, Pantheon+ and SH0ES, BOSS DR12 voids (Mao et al. 2017). All public.